Analysis of social media too often reduces in people’s minds to “screwing around on Facebook while getting paid for it”.  The fact is, social network analysis is a discipline that reaches back thirty years.  Long before Twitter and Facebook and LiveJournal came on the scene, SNA was an academic discipline that existed to study the relationships between structures in an organization, or structures and people across organizations.

Obtaining data for SNA study back then was laborious and invasive – think of studies of a large institution’s emails, for example, and all the frightful political and technical difficulties in obtaining and anonymizing that data.   All done in an attempt to survey fairly and with scientific validity the often very unstructured human communications contained therein, to discover trust relationships or the presence and boundaries of formal and informal structures.

Today, these restrictions have been dissolved by the rise of the web, and most recently, by social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter that offer APIs (applications programming interfaces) that allow deeply customized views into gigantic flows of social communication.  The new reality is that study of structure and message, of context along with content has fewer barriers and more payoff than ever.

Social Network Analysis For Startups by Maksim Tsvetovat and Alexander Kouznetsov  is a incredibly useful piece of work by two veteran researchers in social network architecture who, are in a sense, emerging from the backwater discipline they inhabited before the rise of Twitter and Facebook to step right into the mainstream of NPO and NGO communications.  In an approachable style, they cover:

  • How internal social networks affect a company’s ability to perform
  • Follow terrorists and revolutionaries through the 1998 Khobar Towers bombing, the 9/11 attacks, and the Egyptian uprising
  • Learn how a single special-interest group can control the outcome of a national election
  • Examine relationships between companies through investment networks and shared boards of directors
  • Delve into the anatomy of cultural fads and trends—offline phenomena often mediated by Twitter and Facebook
I think this is the most important work in social media yet. Then again, I’m biased — I expect nothing less from the great folks at O’Reilly.

{ 0 comments }

#occupywallstreet

Image by otromundoesposible_com via Flickr

In a sense, the growth and momentum of the Occupy Wall Street protests gathered in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Boston and elsewhere was in the making for a long time.  A May 2011 CNN poll showed that nine out of ten Americans blamed Wall Street for the direct economic pressure they felt as consumers at the gas pump. The national mood holds a lot of anger over the overwhelming power of big business –  over markets to be sure, but also over our civics and in our government,.

As communications consultants, it’s our job to refine and sharpen messages for the chosen medium. Which is why I had to do something when I saw Occupy Wall Street – a movement we love and support –  release communications that were anything but refined and sharpened.

I see a similar lack-of-editing problem often with clients in our consultancy.  We often encounter this in the context of social media strategies and tactics. In short, we consult with our clients on what should be said and why. The social media space and its interactive potential means that simple PR skill is not enough. We have to understand the technical and semantic underpinnings of social media messaging.

Over at my personal blog, I applied these to the building of a draft declaration for Occupy Wall Street, submitted in solidarity to the group. A couple of days later, I wrote up a description of the rationale behind cleaning up the OWS messaging.

In terms of social media, I’d like to point here to the word budget as major factor in the editorial decisions. 300 words is the appropriate target for blog posts, for reader engagement without attention loss, and for issue framing in brief, repeatable, digestible pieces.   What follows is more or less at that target length:

————————————————————————————————————
WHY ARE WE HERE?

WE WANT OUR ECONOMY BACK

The bloated and reckless financial sector harms the real economy. 40 years ago, the financial sector commanded 2% of all the economy’s profits. Today, it commands over 40%. We, in the real economy, demand a 1% tax on all securities transactions. We call for the nationalization and breakup of all “too big to fail” financial institutions. We call for the nationalization and de-privatization of the Federal Reserve Bank. WE WANT OUR ECONOMY BACK.

WE WANT OUR DEMOCRACY BACK

We will no longer pretend we are well-represented by a government corrupted by runaway financial and commercial interests. We demand public service. We demand an end to the normalized corruption of our democracy by 1) instituting public financing of elections, 2) ending all lobbying for changes to the tax code, 3) the end of audit-less electronic balloting systems. WE WANT OUR DEMOCRACY BACK.

WE WANT OUR JOBS BACK

Wall Street’s political power has far exceeded Washington’s. The economy’s biggest players have the biggest say in its outcomes. Now, we want our say. Corporate profits and cash reserves are near all-time highs. Yet, unemployment is effectively well over 15% while “job creators” create only excuses. WE WANT OUR JOBS BACK.

WE WANT OUR HOMES BACK We signed on the dotted line. But Wall Street banks didn’t. We didn’t want a housing bubble. Wall Street’s banks and derivatives traders created one. We are not in default, we are victims of massive financial fraud. We demand an immediate cessation of foreclosures. WE WANT OUR HOMES BACK.

WE WANT ARRESTS AND PROSECUTION OF FINANCIAL TERRORISTS

Too big to fail is too big to jail. We demand immediate indictments on charges of securities fraud for Lloyd Blankfein (Goldman Sachs), Vikram Pandit (Citi), John Stumpf (Wells Fargo). Jamie Dimon (JPM/Chase), Ken Lewis (BoA), Martin J. Sullivan (AIG). WE WANT ARRESTS AND PROSECUTIONS OF FINANCIAL TERRORISTS.

WE WILL NOT LEAVE UNTIL WE REGAIN OUR ECONOMIC CIVIL RIGHTS.
—————————————————————————————————————-

It’s certainly true that messaging for a protest has a wider audience and different goals than your NPO’s messaging.  Nonetheless, chances are, your messaging could use a cleanup.  Nothing beats memorability – memorability to readers as well as to search engines.  It’s worth the extra effort to impart the maximum.

{ 0 comments }

Along with help in communications and digital strategy, we help our clients with research.  I was researching new non-profit insurance coverage for my client when  I came across this list of different types of insurance coverage made available through the Alliance of Non-Profit Insurance (AIN).

AIN provides insurance to non-profit organizations in twenty-six states, so this is a good guide of possible coverage available to your organization.

I’m no insurance expert, so I learned some things that I didn’t know while reading through these coverage options.   Most notably, some facts about volunteer insurance coverage, sexual assault insurance and employee benefit liability insurance.   While briefing my client on their options, we found areas of potential liability that they didn’t realize they needed to consider  seriously.  One such situation is going to necessiate a rider to their policy.

AIN’s website is tailored, it seems to me, to provide precise information to the new executive of an NPO as an invaluable aid for enumerating the various liability areas particular to NPOs.

It’s always a good idea to explore all of your options before buying new insurance – or buying any financial product.  Good, experienced brokers or agents will share these new products with you, but not many are experienced enough with or oriented toward the special requirements of a nonprofit – especially your kind of nonprofit.  Always research your liabilities and then ask questions of the agents and brokers.

 

{ 0 comments }

The new NFL logo went into use at the 2008 draft.

Image via Wikipedia

Is the National Football League a nonprofit organization?  That giant symbol of mainstream sports, of foam rubber fingers, and multimillion dollar TV commercials?  Is the NFL a 501(c)(6)?

Yes, according to IRS.gov:

A business league is an association of persons having some common business interest, the purpose of which is to promote such common interest and not to engage in a regular business of a kind ordinarily carried on for profit. Trade associations and professional associations are business leagues. To be exempt, a business league’s activities must be devoted to improving business conditions of one or more lines of business as distinguished from performing particular services for individual persons. No part of a business league’s net earnings may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual and it may not be organized for profit to engage in an activity ordinarily carried on for profit (even if the business is operated on a cooperative basis or produces only enough income to be self-sustaining).  The term line of business generally refers either to an entire industry or to all components of an industry within a geographic area.  It does not include a group composed of businesses that market a particular brand within an industry.

Okay, maybe it’s not the biggest surprise.  The NFL acts as the overseer of 32 privately owned teams while itself holding 501(c)(6) status. This is a fairly classic example of a “hybrid” structure where the connective tissue holding together one or more for-profit entities attains a non-profit status.

On the other hand, the tax code specifically includes the term “professional football leagues”, suggesting the organization had a hand in changing the tax code on its behalf and for its benefit.

The lesson remains: given the billions in private dollars pumped through the institution of football, learning the NPO status of the NFL is a cue to review the tax and fiduciary structure of your NPO and its projects.  You might score a touchdown with a reorganization.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

{ 0 comments }

5 Tips For Applying To Google For Nonprofits

August 15, 2011

Applying to Google For Nonprofits has some twists and turns. What are some time-saving tips?

Read the full article →

Is Facebook Publishing Your Phone Contact List?

August 10, 2011

One more gaffe in a long line of them from Facebook’s seriously broken concept of user privacy.

Read the full article →

How To Get A Handle On Facebook Features Confusion

August 9, 2011

Facebook is constantly changing its look, its features and capabilities. How do we stay on top of all of the instability?

Read the full article →

Search For Volunteer Opportunities With Chicago Cares

August 5, 2011

Chicago Cares is a great way to explore large-scale volunteer opportunities.

Read the full article →

11 Nonprofit Websites (Re)Designed For The Social Web

July 19, 2011

Want to take a peek at some recent site redesigns from big names in nonprofit? Sure you do – and here it is.  Okay, so it’s lacking in in-depth technical or design analysis.  But it’s still an eye-opener about contemporary non-profit site designs, and we thank Heather Mansfield at Nonprofit Tech 2.0 for roping it [...]

Read the full article →

Welcome To Our Blogroll: New Labor Media

July 17, 2011

New Labor Media examines the newest labor union websites for effective interactive design.

Read the full article →